11/12/2023 0 Comments Adobe indesign cs5 6It's OK implement new features, even multimedia. Not multimedia.That's why we did choose InDesign (and not Dreamware, MS Office, Flash.). InDesign has imposed itself as a follower for PageMaker and concurrent to QuarkXPress. However there are A LOT of users (me included) that need footnotes (almost everyone that makes technical books, a lot of magazines - where you need to bee more flexible with the footnotes) and so on.Īnd there is also another aspect of the problem. I also can agree that not everybody needs all the features and that everyone will find something useful in the new features. To say its's a slap in the face is maybe a to strong word. ![]() Or am I missing something? I'm no software developer, so it's certainly possible! makes the whole update feel like a bit of a slap in the face to print designers.Īnyway, anger aside, does anyone know why it's taking so long for what seems like such a small change? Part of the reason that I'm so annoyed is that it seems as though, now that footnotes are supported, it would be quite simple to enable dynamic endnotes (aren't they just footnotes pulled to the end of the document, rather than the bottom of each page?). ![]() The fact that time and resources have been put into making InDesign able to produce and output Flash files and place video files into PDFs while ignoring endnotes, notes in tables, footnotes spanning columns, improved tables, etc. The official help file still has to send readers to a blog for a work around (), which seems, to be honest, pathetic. Some of the new features sound as though they'll be quite useful (different page sizes and some of the UI improvements especially), but I have to say I'm quite annoyed that endnotes still haven't been introduced to InDesign.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |